CMS - Alfresco, Magnolia, Drupal and Joomla Comparison -
i comparing alfresco, magnolia & joomla specific following features:
a. ease of integration of user created templates. b. jcr (jsr-170?) or cmis compliance. c. scalability in architecture. d. mobile site deployment.
i used cmsmatrix.org compare features not of specific information related above mentioned points.
any insights based on experience on working 1 or more of above cms products helpful.
thanks,
krish.
while these 4 products branded cms don't think comparable. drupal and, know, joomla web publishing cms (or wcms), designed create web sites , manage content. not designed generic cms, dms or ecm. alfresco, , magnolia, ecm/dms designed manage enterprise contents.
for instance, while manageable in drupal (given enough effort , custom php code), complex multi-states multi-actor workflow multilingual documents (pdf, office, etc.) easier manage alfresco. , alfresco not suitable manage web content lightweight publishing workflow , user generated content.
having managed content published on web site not means has managed same tools 1 used manage web site. instance, using drupal cmis module, can bridge alfresco (or cmis compliant ecm) manage enterprise content in suitable tools publish parts of on drupal site.
Comments
Post a Comment